In an adverse impact case, if an employer can show that a challenged employment practice is job related and consistent with business necessity, the plaintiff can still win by showing that:
a. there is an alternative practice that would have less discriminatory effects, but the employer declines to use it
b. the employer has engaged in a pattern or practice of discrimination
c. the difference in selection rates across protected class groups is statistically significant
d. the four-fifth's rule has been violated
Answer: a. there is an alternative practice that would have less discriminatory effects, but the employer declines to use it
If the answers is incorrect or not given, you can answer the above question in the comment box. If the answers is incorrect or not given, you can answer the above question in the comment box.